Whyhas no one mentioned that 16:9 is 1.77:1, and that The Avengers was shot at 1.85:1? 1.85:1 on a 16:9 screen will result in quite small letterbox bars (about 1 cm thick on a
A16:9 screen has a ratio of 1.78:1 so is therefore not quite as wide as a 1.85:1 screen of the same height. 16:9 of course is the standard ratio for almost all widescreen sets (tube and RPTV). With front projection of course, you can order basically any screen size/ratio you want. However, most people get 16:9 or 4:3 depending on their

185:1. Similar to the 16:9 size but slightly wider, whatever you shoot in 1.85:1 will show on widescreen TVs and computer monitors with thin black bars on the top and bottom of the screen. Most feature films use this aspect ratio, but some high-end TV

Thevideo aspect ratio indicates the orientation of a video by providing the ratio of width to height as measured in pixels. The numbers that appear in the ratio are not necessarily representative of the height
Interms of video, an aspect ratio is an expression of the ratio (or relationship) of the width to the height. If a video is 1280 x 720 pixels, then it can be said that it’s 16:9 or 16 units by 9 units. This ratio can also be expressed as 1.77:1, so the width is 1.77 times the height. It’s the shape of the frame, and frames are all a Cinemasare set up for 1.85:1 projection, as is the workflow and the cameras designed for cinema productions. 16:9 can have slight pillars on either side if you're going through the full 2k DCP workflow,. If you don't want to shoot 1.85, no one is stopping you shooting 16:9, many low budget films are shot using that aspect ratio. Asa 2.35:1 Display. 11.11% smaller diagonal. 20.99% smaller area. 12.50% larger diagonal. 26.56% larger area. Share your Comparison. 24 inch 16x9 display vs 27 inch 16x9 display.
Theproblem is when these 2.35:1 films have to be adapted to play on 16:9 televisions. Either the sides are cut off or the image is stretched, both of which alter what the film-makers had envisioned, or you have the "black bars". What I'd like to see is a new 2.35:1 standard for televisions rather than a 16:9 standard for films.
Bothwith 16:9 and 2.35:1, most times I prefer smaller 16:9 diagonal size than 2.35 from same distance. Of course there are always exceptions, some Imax movies and documentations like Planet Earth, demands bigger size than scope movies. But I think theese presentations represent under 1-2% to total consumption.
Cinemascope2.35:1 aspect ratio cheat sheet with correct dimensions for most standard video resolutions; including 720p, 1080p, and 4K.Often referred to as w
Asa 2.35:1 Display: 16.50% larger diagonal 35.72% larger area: 14.16% smaller diagonal 26.32% smaller area : Share your Comparison: 43 inch 16x9 display vs 35 inch 21x9 display .
  • 2t70qyfr3n.pages.dev/280
  • 2t70qyfr3n.pages.dev/125
  • 2t70qyfr3n.pages.dev/297
  • 2t70qyfr3n.pages.dev/247
  • 2t70qyfr3n.pages.dev/439
  • 2t70qyfr3n.pages.dev/236
  • 2t70qyfr3n.pages.dev/270
  • 2t70qyfr3n.pages.dev/57

    • 2.35 1 vs 16 9